Because I spend all my time bitching about shit you might find amusing, I'm not to successful with the ladies. I joined some dating web sites to release my potential children. By that I mean sex. Well, I've noticed that there's some problems with a couple of the profiles that girls come up with. And so the fun begins.....
First off, there are some ugly people out there. If you don't have all your teeth or some kind of hideous, you need to go to the dating website for mutants. Ya'll are pretty much a lost cause. The next group of people on here that require my comments I actually respect. There is a group of women that prey on little nerds like me and seduce them for money. These sirens of the net e-wink and e-flirt with us making us believe that somebody in Hong Kong actually wants nerd penis. In actuality these teen seductors want we e-pimps to register for sites and spend some money trying to see some virtual titties. Personally I'm a member of 13. These lovely ladies are learning valuable skills that prepare them for the future. Namely marketing for obvious reasons, but also debate. "No I don't think I could afford tittiestittiestitties.com." "Oh, but, baby, I want you to see me dance for you in my undies for the low price of $20 a minute." "Me too. Let me get my mommies credit card." Good job ladies. No longer are you confined the strip clubs and street corners to pay for college. Now you can exploit your only gift from the comfort of your own home. xoxo ;)
Now this next group of people are the ones that actually got me mad enough to log of off World of Warcraft. These are the girls that are too fucked up to get a piece in the real world that resort-like me-to the world wide web. Except these ladies fuck shit up on the web too. This is the situation...if you say that you want to have a long term relationship please don't put up pictures that show what a whore you would like to be.
"I'm looking for a real man for a long term relationship. Don't contact me if your looking for straight sex. I won't respond." That is a summary/gist of the profiles that I'm referring to. Two things wrong with that. 1) wrong website for relationship looking web surfers. 2) Claiming that you want a serious relationship and putting up pictures of your lopsided boobies and shoving a Coke bottle up you twat that looks like and Arby's sandwich. It just sends a mixed message. Please, psycho surfers, the Internet is a place where we can be somebody else so you don't have to be annoying. Save some cyber space for we non-crazy dysfunctional people that actually know what we want. Thank you for your time, but you piss me off.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
NBC's "Mercy"
First of all I noticed trend in the new TV programs coming out in the last couple of years. The producers, writers, actors, or whoever has a new concept that they can now utilize. This is the, "Iraqi war vet" concept. Characters on new television series' now are Iraqi war vets.
It is interesting to note that, to my knowledge, there aren't any Afghanistan veteran characters that we may stereotype, but That's probably because the media hasn't been fucused on Afghanistan till recently. However, I digress. The trend that I noticed in the programs don't necessarily put the character in a bad light all the time, but instead makes them dysfunctional or on anti-anxiety meds (or the like) because they spent time in Iraq. Where do the people who develope the concepts get them. It just seems lazy to me.
One show in particular that I'm blasting in this blog is NBC's “Mercy.” OK, I've only seen one episode, but that was more than enough for me to deduce that the show has two writers. One with a clue and one with a lazy stereotype. The one with a clue accurately portrays a woman who (let's be honest here) rates a five maybe a six on a scale of ten. However, take the same girl and put her in Iraq, she suddenly becomes a 35. Now with all this new attention she's getting in Iraq, the once sweet and caring nurse becomes a whore and breaks her wedding vows. Good job writer because you nailed it.
The second writer, the one that gets it aaaaallllllllll wrong, needs to pay an E-1 that's been down range for 10 minutes $50 for a day to become a technical advisor. And this is why. The only episode I watched has the Mercy girl waking up from a nightmare which implies that she has some level of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is where I throw my bullshit flag. Or in this case bullshit panties. First of all any chick with a rating of four and over does not get put in harms way. As long as you don't look ugly, you stay in the rear. It just works out that way. Yes, women can be in the Army, and some have died. But not one that's not ugly and in a medical unit. These “free spirited” ladies deal with the guys that have actually been in harm's way. It is, I concede, likely that she saw blood. It is not likely that she has PTSD from actually seeing combat like the writer is trying to imply. It doesn't happen. End of story.
It is to you second writer that I write this blog. I thank you for fucking up. It is because of you that society will believe that women actually belong in a war. It is because of you that women will actually end up in combat. It is because of you that standards are and will continue to drop across the board and in the end cost lives. Thanks again keep up the good work.
It is interesting to note that, to my knowledge, there aren't any Afghanistan veteran characters that we may stereotype, but That's probably because the media hasn't been fucused on Afghanistan till recently. However, I digress. The trend that I noticed in the programs don't necessarily put the character in a bad light all the time, but instead makes them dysfunctional or on anti-anxiety meds (or the like) because they spent time in Iraq. Where do the people who develope the concepts get them. It just seems lazy to me.
One show in particular that I'm blasting in this blog is NBC's “Mercy.” OK, I've only seen one episode, but that was more than enough for me to deduce that the show has two writers. One with a clue and one with a lazy stereotype. The one with a clue accurately portrays a woman who (let's be honest here) rates a five maybe a six on a scale of ten. However, take the same girl and put her in Iraq, she suddenly becomes a 35. Now with all this new attention she's getting in Iraq, the once sweet and caring nurse becomes a whore and breaks her wedding vows. Good job writer because you nailed it.
The second writer, the one that gets it aaaaallllllllll wrong, needs to pay an E-1 that's been down range for 10 minutes $50 for a day to become a technical advisor. And this is why. The only episode I watched has the Mercy girl waking up from a nightmare which implies that she has some level of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is where I throw my bullshit flag. Or in this case bullshit panties. First of all any chick with a rating of four and over does not get put in harms way. As long as you don't look ugly, you stay in the rear. It just works out that way. Yes, women can be in the Army, and some have died. But not one that's not ugly and in a medical unit. These “free spirited” ladies deal with the guys that have actually been in harm's way. It is, I concede, likely that she saw blood. It is not likely that she has PTSD from actually seeing combat like the writer is trying to imply. It doesn't happen. End of story.
It is to you second writer that I write this blog. I thank you for fucking up. It is because of you that society will believe that women actually belong in a war. It is because of you that women will actually end up in combat. It is because of you that standards are and will continue to drop across the board and in the end cost lives. Thanks again keep up the good work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)